Sunday, November 30, 2008

The Rise Of The Fourth Reich

Cam is not the author of this article... Cam only agrees with some of the parallels presented...

SOURCE LINK

Everyone likes to say, "Hitler did this", and, "Hitler did that". But the truth is Hitler did very little. He was a world class tyrant, but the evil actually done by the Third Reich, from the slave-labor camps to WW2 was all done by German citizens who were afraid to question if what they were told by their government was the truth or not, and who because they did not want to admit to themselves that they were afraid to question the government, refused to see the truth behind the Reichstag Fire (
link), refused to see the invasion by Poland was a staged fake, and followed Hitler into national disaster.

The German people of the late 1930s imagined themselves to be brave. They saw themselves as the heroic Germans depicted by the Wagnerian Operas, the descendants of the fierce Germanic warriors who had hunted wild boar with nothing but spears and who had defeated three of Rome's mightiest legions in the Tuetenberg Forest.

But in truth, by the 1930s, the German people had become civilized and tamed, culturally obsessed with fine details in both science and society. Their self-image of bravery was both salve and slavery. Germans were required to behave as if they were brave, even when they were not.

It's easy to look back and realize what a jerk Hitler was. But at the time, Hitler looked pretty good to the German people, with the help of the media. He was TIME Magazine's Man Of The Year in 1938. The German people assumed they were safe from a tyrant. They lived in a Republic, after all, with strict laws regarding what the government could and more importantly could not do. Their leader was a devoutly religious man, and had even sung with the boy's choir of a monastery in his youth.

The reality was that the German people, as individuals, had lost their courage. The German government preferred it that way as a fearful people are easier to rule than a courageous one. But the German people didn't wish to lose their self-image of courage. So, when confronted with a situation demanding individual courage, in the form of a government gone wrong, the German people simply pretended that the situation did not exist. And in that simple self-deception lay the ruin of an entire nation and the coming of the second World War.

When the Reichstag burned down, most Germans simply refused to believe suggestions that the fire had been staged by Hitler himself. They were afraid to. But so trapped were the Germans by their belief in their own bravery that they willed themselves to be blind to the evidence before their eyes, so that they could nod in agreement with Der Fuhrer while still imagining themselves to have courage, even as they avoided the one situation which most required real courage; to stand up to Hitler's lies and deceptions.

When Hitler requested temporary extraordinary powers, powers specifically banned under German law, but powers Hitler claimed he needed to have to deal with the "terrorists", the German people, having already sold their souls to their self-delusions, agreed. The temporary powers were conferred, and once conferred lasted until Germany itself was destroyed.

When Hitler staged a phony invasion from Poland, the vast majority of the German people, their own self-image dependant on continuing blindness to Hitler's deceptions, did not question why Poland would have done something so stupid, and found themselves in a war.

But Hitler knew he ruled a nation of cowards, and knew he had to spend the money to make the new war something cowards could fight and win. He decorated his troops with regalia to make them proud of themselves, further trapping them in their self-image. Hitler copied the parade regalia of ancient Rome, to remind the Germans of the defeat of the legions at the Tuetenberg Forest. Talismans were added from orthodox religions and the occult to fill the soldiers with delusions of mystical strengths and an afterlife if they fell in battle. Finally, knowing that it takes courage to kill the enemy face to face, Hitler spent vast sums of money on his wonder weapons, airplanes, submarines, ultra-long range artillery, the world's first cruise missile and the world's first guided missile, weapons that could be used to kill at a distance, so that those doing the killing need not have to face the reality of what they were doing.

The German people were lured into WW2 not because they were brave, but because they were cowards who wanted to be seen as brave, and found that shooting long range weapons at people they could not see took less courage than standing up to Hitler. Sent into battle by that false image of courage, the Germans were dependent on their wonder-weapons. When the wonder-weapons stopped working, the Germans lost the war.

I remember as a child listening to the stories of WW2 from my grandfather and my uncles who had served in Europe. I wondered how the German people could have been so stupid as to have ever elected Hitler dog catcher, let alone leader of the nation. Such is the clarity of historical hindsight. And with that clarity, I see the exact same mechanism that Hitler used at work here in this nation.

The American people imagine themselves to be brave. They see themselves as the heroic Americans depicted by Western Movies, the descendants of the fierce patriot warriors who had tamed the frontier and defeated the might of the British Empire. But in truth, by the dawn of the third millennium, the American people have become civilized and tamed, culturally obsessed with fine details in both science and society. Their self-image of bravery is both salve and slavery. Americans are required to behave as if they are brave, even when they are not.

The American people assume they are safe. They live in a Republic, after all, with strict laws regarding what the government can and more importantly cannot do. Their leader is a devoutly religious man.

The reality is that the American people, as individuals, have lost their courage. The government prefers it that way as a fearful people are easier to rule than a courageous one. But Americans don't wish to lose their self-image of courage. So, when confronted with a situation demanding courage, in the form of a government gone wrong, the American people simply pretend that the situation does not exist.

When the World Trade Towers collapsed, most Americans simply refused to believe suggestions that the attacks had been staged by parties working for the US Government itself. Americans were afraid to, even as news reports surfaced proving that the US Government had announced plans for the invasion of Afghanistan early in the year, plans into which the attacks on the World Trade Towers which angered the American people into support of the already-planned war fit entirely too conveniently.

But so trapped are Americans by their belief in their own bravery that they will themselves to be blind to the evidence before their eyes, so that they can nod in agreement with the government while still imagining themselves to have courage, even as they avoid the one situation which most requires real courage; to stand up to the government's lies and deceptions. The vast majority of the American people, their own self-image dependant on continuing blindness to the government's deceptions, never question why Afghanistan would have done something so stupid as to attack the United States, and as a result, Americans find themselves in a war.

Now the US Government has requested temporary extraordinary powers, powers specifically banned under Constitutional law, but powers the government is claiming they need to have to deal with the "terrorists". The American people, having already sold their souls to their self-delusions, are agreeing. The temporary powers recently conferred will be no more temporary in America than they were in Germany.

The US Government knows they rule a nation of cowards. The government has had to spend the money to make the new war something cowards can fight. The government has decorated the troops with regalia to make them proud of themselves, further trapping them in their self-image. Talismans are added from orthodox religions and the occult to fill the soldiers with delusions of mystical strengths and an afterlife if they fall in battle.

Finally, knowing that it takes courage to kill the enemy face to face, the United States government has spent vast sums of money on wonder weapons, airplanes, submarines, ultra-long range artillery, cruise missiles, and guided missiles, weapons that kill at a distance, so that those doing the killing need not have to face the reality of what they are doing. As I mentioned above, Hitler was TIME Magazine's Man Of The Year in 1938. Stalin was TIME Magazine's Man Of The Year for 1939 and 1942. Both of these men, and many others also celibrated by the media, were unimaginable monsters. The lesson from these facts is that it isn't easy to spot a genocidal tyrant when you live with one, especially one whom the press supports and promotes.

bush_time.jpg


Tyrants become obvious only when looking back, after what they have done becomes known. The German people did not stand up to Hitler because their media betrayed them, just as the American media is betraying the American people by willingly, voluntarily, even proudly, abandoning its traditional role as watchdog against government abuse.

It is the very nature of power that it attracts the sort of people who should not have it. The United States, as the world's last superpower, is a prize that attracts men and women willing to do absolutely anything to win that power, and hence are also willing to do absolutely anything with that power once they have it. If one thinks about it long enough, one will realize that all tyrants, past and most especially present, MUST use deception on their population to initiate a war.

No citizen of a modern industrialized nation will send their children off to die in a war to grab another nation's resources and assets, yet resources and assets are what all wars are fought over. The nation that wishes to initiate a war of conquest must create the illusion of an attack or a threat to start a war, and must always give their population of cowards an excuse never to question that carefully crafted illusion.

It is naive, not to mention racist to assume that tyrants appear only in other nations and that somehow America is immune simply because we're Americans. America has escaped the clutches of a dictatorship thus far only through the efforts of those citizens who, unlike the Germans of the 1930s, have the moral courage to stand up and point out where the government is lying to the people.

Unless more Americans are willing to have that kind of individual courage, then future generations may well look back on the American people with the same harshness of judgement with which we look back on the 1930s Germans.

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Ayo Technology

What does it say to you when you're the 'new boyfriend' yet her voice mail message still says that her, her brother, and her ex-boyfriend can't come to the phone? And she doesn't change it even after being told about it; even by the 'new boyfriend'? I mean, if it were me, I would've immediately changed something like that because I'm sure roles reversed... any girlfriend of mine wouldn't want ANY mention of any of my ex's anywhere. Especially when they call me, get my voice mail and have to hear that my ex isn't there either. Then again, maybe I'm being too trivial. What does it matter anyway?

Before I even knew what was happening, this girl I'd come to love deeply over such a short period of time, is gone. A shooting star: just as quickly as it appears, its beauty vanishes into the night in a brilliant flash; leaving you with little more than the intangible memory of what once was.

I just wonder if the voice mail message has changed?

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

jr Says

This comment was not written by me, however I enjoyed the comment and the coincidence. =)

I came across it while watching a YouTube video highlighting the similarities between the story-line of the Star Wars prequel trilogy and modern day false-flag terror. 

Though I should say personally, I'm EXTREMELY skeptical of the 'no planes on 9/11' theory... nonetheless I keep an open mind...

He's right though; the corporate controlled media is just as guilty as those orchestrating the attacks.

" jr. Says: 

So far 2 million people have been slaughtered because 4 planes crashed on 911. Over 100,000 people have been tortured and imprisoned because 4 planes crashed on 911. Over 100,000 US military personnel, contractors, soldiers, National Guard have been killed or injured because 4 planes crashed on 911. Over $3 Trillion+ dollars has been spent or put on the “war tab credit card” because 4 planes crashed on 911. Over $100,000,000,000 Billion US dollars has been given directly to companies that have direct ties to the Bush regime because 4 planes crashed on 911. The passage on the Patriot Act, establishment of Homeland security, killing of Paul Wellstone, demolition of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, bogus anthrax scares, elimination of Habeas Corpus, total degrading of ALL civil liberties in the US, thumbing the nose of International Law and illegal pre-emptive invasions based on known and admitted lies, violent orders giving to telecoms to obey and illegally spy, threatening other countries with retaliation and retribution……all because 4 planes crashed on 911.

To this date…11/22/08……NOT ONE SINGLE PIECE OF VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE REGARDING THE EXISTANCE OF ANY PLANE AT ANY OF THE 4 LOCATIONS ON 911 HAS EVER BEEN FOUND. Read that last line again. There were a combined 13,000,000 parts from all 4 airliners that day on 911 that could and would easily identify it. NOT ONE has ever been produced or verified. NOT ONE SINGLE PIECE. Please keep in mind that “eyewitnesses” have never counted as proof that an airliner has crashed. Only wreckage counts. Media film has never counted as evidence that an airliner has crashed. Only wreckage counts. The reason the airlines have yet to be paid for the 4 planes that were lost on 911 is because the insurance company inquiry was unable to verify A SINGLE PIECE of any of the 13,000,000 pieces of wreckage from any of the 4 planes at any of the 4 locations from 911. There were NO PLANES on 911.

The media is directly responsible for the continued and demanded lies that were forcibly sold to the world. The US corporate owned media is as responsible for what happened on 911 as anyone in the Bush regime. Long after this current criminal president is gone….these media criminals will still be here. US laws of corporate owned media that profits directly from wars and military spending MUST change…..or we will see this event again……."

http://www.infowars.com/?p=6088&cp=3#comments

Saturday, November 22, 2008

JFK

Vaccine Machine


The more I think about it, the more concerned I've become over the practice of vaccination. Especially given that it may not be as safe as those in the medical industry would have us believe - yes, believe it or not, it's an industry and industries are in business to make products that will MAKE MONEY. Most of us blindly follow what we're told, typically allowing the mainstream media to be our primary source of information, without ever giving it a second thought; like lambs to the slaughter.

My personal view is that if even just a few vaccines are eventually proven to be unsafe or have even possible "links" to other diseases, side effects, or other potential long-term health problems, then I'm going to assume that the entire practice of vaccination probably isn't terribly safe or effective overall... at least, not to the level that those 'peddling the merchandise' would have you believe anyway.

It seems like commons sense that continuously injecting foreign chemicals, toxins, viruses, DNA and who knows what else directly into your bloodstream can, and likely will, have a detrimental affect on your long-term or overall health. I'm not saying that every single person injected with any particular vaccine is going to get some disease and/or die; simply the fact that a percentage of those "immunized" do develop severe long-term health problems, quite possibly as a result of one or more ingredients contained in the vaccine or the administering of a combination of vaccines. So ask yourself; is it really worth the risk?

Something tells me that profit (in addition to the possibility for hidden goals of population control and reduction) is the driving factor in mass immunization programs, not necessarily "public health", though I'm sure an argument can certainly be made for such.

I think about it this way: you are "immunized" with a vaccine manufactured and sold by Pharma-Company XYZ, a vaccine which also happens have "unproven" or "controversial" links to causing, for example, diabetes (certainly evidence exists to suggest at minimum a casual relationship between childhood immunization and the onset of diabetes, among other a host of other disorders)… and Pharma-Company XYZ also just so happens to manufacture insulin for diabetics… it shouldn't take a rocket scientist (maybe just a really good accountant =P) to figure out that astronomical profits can be generated from this cycle since, in addition to making a profit from initially administering this vaccine, you now have a patient who has developed a lifelong dependence on your insulin shots.

All the while the "debate" rages on and they continue to administer the controversial vaccine, creating new profits, while the "sheople" (that's us, the mindless flock) are simultaneously fed all manner of propaganda and skewed science apparently demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine or drug. How often have you seen Viagra or Cialis commercials (ask your doctor is Cialis is right for you)? Big bucks are sponsoring YOUR perception of the world via television and print; big Pharma bucks. In turn, those stations and media outlets will not, in any way, compromise that revenue by airing or publishing anything even remotely controversial about their sponsors.

Here's what I found when I simply Googled "what causes diabetes?":
"As stated before, diabetes is a syndrome or group of diseases (rather than one disease), leading to the prolonged hyperglycemic state. Type 1 is most associated with the killing of the beta cells, most likely by the body's own immune system. Either the immune system cannot kill an infecting agent, which then kills the beta cells, or the immune system itself goes "wild," attacking the body's own tissue and destroying the beta cells. The cells of the islets of Langerhans are inflamed, resulting from an infectious-disease process (for example, mumps) or, more commonly, from an autoimmune (allergic to self) response." http://chinese-school.netfirms.com/diabetes-causes.html
Based on that, it seems to me it's entirely possible (if not probable) that the reason a persons immune system all of a sudden starts to go "wild" and attack itself, thus leading to the onset of diabetes, is quite possibly BECAUSE OF these foreign agents suddenly being injected directly into the bloodstream via a vaccine or combination of vaccines. Notice it says that the islet cells are inflamed "from an infectious-disease process (for example, MUMPS)"… this appears to be a possible connection to our childhood buddy the MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) vaccine to me. And I couldn't write this any better if I tried - Sanofi-aventis Canada Inc. (according to their website "the Canadian affiliate of the sanofi-aventis Group, one of the world's leading pharmaceutical companies.") manufactures both the MMR vaccine AND insulin.
"This based on the fact that the MMR package inserts clearly states diabetes to be one of the adverse reactions after the MMR inoculation. That along with Arthritis, Urticaria, Leukocyte destruction, aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, nerve deafness, Guillain-Barre and death."
http://poisonevercure.150m.com/vaccines/diabetes.htm

Is that true? Why would anyone get "immunized" if they could potentially DIE or even contract any one of those nasty diseases from the immunization process?! I'll take my chances with the measles, thank you.

Now to go a step further, any mandatory vaccination programs that may be introduced by government will only
guarantee profits for the companies that are contracted to manufacture and supply the vaccine for these mandatory programs. They're getting money and they don't really care. After all, they have large, well funded PR departments to deal with negative publicity, in addition to cooperation from their partners in the media.

Many with vested interests are at this moment attempting to make certain vaccines mandatory prior to school attendance. A good example would be if they make the HPV vaccine mandatory (the FDA's website even admits that the HPV virus doesn't cause cervical cancer yet the vaccine marketers are advertising it as a way to prevent cervical cancer!).

At $162 per dose multiplied by the 3 doses needed = $486 for a single person. Now simply multiply the cost of that vaccine for a single person by the number of students in the country that would be mandated to receive it… we're talking about millions, if not billions, of dollars spent on vaccine contracts if such laws are passed. Don't think for a moment that these companies and their investors won't downplay negative or adverse effects of the 'product', bribe and/or coerce law makers into supporting the mandated law, and just flat out lie for that kind of money and power. 

Many of us are nothing more than medical fodder to these exploiters. Think about it – why do we have wars? Is it because it's fun to kill other humans? Maybe for a sick few but I highly doubt that's the case for the vast majority of humanity. Is it because of personal, national, or religious differences that can't be resolved any other way? Maybe but again I think we can come up with better solutions than to kill and destroy. Religion, race, nationality, political allegiance, and all other semblance's of division are merely
illusions created to keep you and I willingly confined within this vile Divide and Conquer scheme.

In my opinion, vaccination is frequently unnecessary and simply a disgusting display of greed at the cost of innocent human lives –
with little difference from war. The only difference is: it's a war for your health and your money; the less you have of both, the easier you are to control since you will rely increasingly on the state for your survival.

If you still believe you'd feel better with the "protection" of the flu shot maybe you should first ask yourself; what exactly are they injecting me with anyway? Here's what I found:
" “Mercury-free” Fluarix® contains fragments from three different influenza viruses. Other added ingredients are thimerosal 1.2 mcg. (49.6% ethyl mercury), octoxynol-10 (spermicide), Tween 80 (.41 mg.) and a-tocopheryl hydrogen succinate (100 mcg.) Residual ingredients from the manufacturing process include ovalbumin, formaldehyde, gentamicin sulfate (antibiotic), sodium deoxycholate and hydrocortisone."
Boy, those sound like fun chemicals. Formaldehyde? Nice. And Thimerosal, 50% ethyl mercury by weight. Check out the video by the University of Calgary showing the effects of mercury on brain cells: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85tgwh3HpsM 

Wait... did that say spermicide?!

Anyway, I'd finally like to simply emphasize: do not believe one single solitary word of what I've said… but don't believe the corporate sponsored media either.

Think for yourself…

Thursday, November 20, 2008

My Very First Blog

Well, here I am. I have officially arrived on the internet as a 'blogger'.

What? No welcome basket?